This episode commenced with a single photograph, perhaps the most impactful ever snapped of a royal family member.
In the frame appeared the Duke of York, standing closely beside a teenage girl, while a companion beamed conspiratorially in the rear.
Lacking that snapshot, captured at a social event in 2001, few would have credited the assertions of a young woman who stated she was trafficked across the sea and obliged to have brief sexual encounters with a prince of the royal bloodline?
A curious, indicative action by someone who had openly claimed to have never heard of her, said he could not have had intimate contact with her, and yet handed over a large amount of his mother's resources to resolve a protracted lawsuit.
In this context, talk of the royals acting swiftly to cut Andrew off are inaccurate. This affair has persisted for the better part of 15 years since that photograph, and another image of Andrew ambling congenially with a notorious individual came to light.
Journeys were printed in public records: chopper transfers from the palace to a country club and back again in time for dining, private flights instead of regular transport, all for the benefit of "the travel enthusiast".
Then there was the presumption which demanded subservience when he appeared in a area or the extreme obsession about his designations used on his correspondence in messages to his friends.
He could get away with it while his mother, who unaccountably pampered him, was still alive. The monarch did at least strip him of official roles and ceremonial ranks in the wake of his catastrophic and, it is now clear, deceptive television interview six years ago.
Merely in the last 14 days that events sped up, following the release of accounts giving more troubling particulars of his conduct and that of his companions.
Further disclosures have again exposed Andrew's thinking that he could escape lying about his contact with a disgraced individual.
People (and the media) were far ahead of the royals. There was no one of any significance to support him, a outcome of all those years of arrogance.
The wiser monarchical figures understood that. The key objective is to hand down the crown, if not as previously at least complete and unblemished.
Over time the last 190 years trying to overcome the legacy of earlier rulers, showing they are beneficial, accountable and reactive to their citizens.
He was placing all that in peril in an age when submission and discretion is no longer sufficient.
Eventually, the famously indecisive king was pushed further. There was little choice. The institution had relinquished authority of the account.
Currently the loss of designations and the ongoing and permanent social disgrace that will afflict Andrew most deeply.
He continues to be a counsellor of state, in principle able to substitute for the sovereign, and he is still eighth in line to the monarchy, but not any of these will truly happen.
Do individuals he encounters still acknowledge him? Might they still make mistakes and call him Your Highness? Would they say Andrew,
Naturally, he is not retiring to a common area, but to the royal family's extensive grounds at Sandringham.
In that place, he will be supplied by the sovereign with one of the royal residences and given some sort of financial support.
This differs from his former home, where he paid a minimal lease for more than 20 years, and the area is a bit far, but even so it may not be far enough.
The situation continues. There are still files in the possession of US Congress to be revealed.
Perhaps for the moment the reputational impact to the crown is restricted. The message from the institution was evidently that the revocation of titles was what the monarch, and notably other senior family members, wanted.
The cessation of pretence that Andrew was making the choice himself. And, notably, the brief statement showed evidently that the royals were aligning with the complainant's narrative of occurrences.
Furthermore, for the premiere occasion they finally showed regard for the affected individuals: "These actions are deemed necessary, despite the truth that he maintains his innocence of the claims against him."
Finally it is entitlement, self-interest and indolence that will kill the monarchy. In his stupidity, self-indulgence and venality, Andrew seems never to have grasped that lesson.
A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in transforming brands through innovative web solutions and creative marketing.